ABC for banks: Bridging the Gap between Costs and Business Activities

In the financial landscape, understanding costs is essential. Traditional costing methods, often driven by broad estimations, were once the staple. However, as business became more complex, the need for a refined method emerged. Enter Activity-Based Costing (ABC), a beacon in modern business accounting, offering precision where older methods blur lines.

What is Activity-Based Costing (ABC)?

ABC allocates at its core overhead costs based on the activities driving those costs. It reveals more in-depth insight, compared to traditional systems. Those might allocate costs simply based on units produced or direct labor. For a bank, instead of just seeing ‘Operational Costs’, ABC would dissect these costs into activities like ‘ATM Maintenance’, ‘Customer Service Calls’, or ‘Loan Application Processing’.

ABC Put in Practice

Consider a hypothetical bank ‘FinFuture’. Using traditional costing, they couldn’t understand why – despite a growing customer base – profits were stagnating. After implementing ABC, they realized ‘Loan Application Processing’ costs were skyrocketing due to manual paperwork. Transitioning to a digital solution, they drastically reduced costs and boosted profitability.

Advantages of using ABC in the financial industry

As the world of finance grows more intricate, the advantages of employing Activity-Based Costing become increasingly evident. Let’s delve deeper into why financial institutions, from large banks to niche brokerage firms, should consider ABC:

1. More Accurate Product and Service Cost

  • Precision: ABC allows financial entities like banks to ascertain the precise costs associated with each service they offer. For instance, understanding the exact cost of processing a wire transfer versus a mobile check deposit can help in strategic pricing.
  • Informed Decision-making: Investment firms, after understanding the detailed costs of managing different portfolios, can more accurately set management fees, ensuring profitability

2. Better Understanding of Overhead

  • Transparent Allocation: Traditional costing might simply distribute overhead evenly. But with ABC, a financial consultancy firm can, for example, differentiate between the overhead costs of a high-net-worth client consultation versus a standard consultation.
  • Resource Management: By pinpointing the high-overhead areas, banks can manage resources better. If a particular branch incurs higher overhead due to its location or staff costs, decisions regarding its viability or potential relocation can be made.

3. Identification of High-Cost and Low-Value Activities

  • Cost Efficiency: Through ABC, a credit institution might realize that a certain segment – like paper-based loan applications – costs them considerably but doesn’t yield proportional value. This insight could prompt them to transition to digital applications, saving costs and time.
  • Strategic Reallocation: A mutual fund company might discern that while a particular fund involves high management and promotional costs, it attracts limited investors. The company could then redirect resources to more profitable ventures.

4. Enhanced Budgeting and Forecasting

  • Predictive Accuracy: With a more detailed cost layout, financial institutions can make more informed predictions. For example, if a bank plans to increase its online banking services, using ABC, it can more accurately estimate the associated costs.
  • Strategic Planning: Financial advisors, understanding their year-on-year cost trends through ABC, can better strategize for expansions, new service launches, or potential downsizing.

In essence, ABC provides financial institutions with a laser-focused lens. Through this lens, every cost, no matter how minuscule, can be traced, analyzed, and optimized, ensuring that every dollar spent is a dollar well-spent.

Challenges in Implementing ABC in Banks

The journey of adopting Activity-Based Costing, particularly in the complex world of finance, is not without its hurdles. Below are the most common challenges faced by financial institutions when transitioning to this method:

  1. Initial setup complexity: ABC requires a granular understanding of various processes. Financial institutions, with their multifaceted services, might find this initial setup laborious. From segregating wealth management services to ATM operations or online banking maintenance, the nitty-gritty can be exhaustive.
  2. Resistance to change: Employees, particularly those seasoned in traditional methods, might view ABC as an unnecessary overhaul. They might be resistant due to misconceptions about the complexity or the fear of potential errors in a new system.
  3. Need for continuous updates: The financial industry is dynamic. New products, services, or regulatory requirements are continuously introduced. Each change might require an adjustment to the ABC model, which can be seen as a continuous overhead.

Overcoming ABC Implementation Challenges

While the challenges might seem daunting, they’re not insurmountable. Here are strategies that financial institutions can employ to ease the transition:

  1. Getting buy-in from top management: When top executives champion ABC, it sends a powerful message down the hierarchy. By presenting potential benefits like cost savings, improved resource allocation, and enhanced profitability, you can gain their support.
  2. Training and education: Educate your team about the long-term benefits of ABC. Interactive workshops, hands-on training sessions, and real-world examples can debunk myths and ease the fear of transition. For instance, illustrating how a mutual fund company improved its fund pricing strategy using ABC can be eye-opening.
  3. Using modern software tools: With advancements in fintech, there are numerous software tools tailored for the financial industry’s ABC needs. Leveraging these tools can automate and simplify the process, reducing manual errors and making the system more adaptive to change.

When is ABC Not Suitable for Your Organization?

While ABC provides profound insights, there are situations where its implementation might be excessive or not yield significant returns on the effort:

  1. Smaller institutions with simple processes: For a small community bank or credit union with a limited range of services, the detailed breakdown that ABC demands might prove more cumbersome than beneficial.
  2. Minimal Overheads: In situations where direct costs dominate and overheads are a negligible component, the nuances of ABC might not offer substantial benefits. For example, a boutique investment firm with most costs tied directly to investments might not benefit significantly from ABC.
  3. Homogeneous Services: Financial entities offering a very niche, homogeneous service where costs are evenly distributed might find traditional costing methods more suitable. If an institution only offers online financial advisory with similar time and resource allocation for each client, the detailed granularity of ABC might be overkill.


ABC transcends mere accounting; it’s a business strategy tool. By dissecting costs, financial institutions – from banks to brokerages – can streamline operations, innovate with clarity, and foster growth.

As the financial world becomes more competitive and consumers demand value,  understanding the real costs in business isn’t just recommended; it’s imperative. ABC, while not a one-size-fits-all, can be the compass guiding institutions to profitability and efficiency.

Would you like to talk to one of our experts?

Fill in the form, and we will reach out to you.

[gravityform id=1 title=false description=false ajax=true tabindex=49]

Don’t want to miss anything?

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on everything cost and performance related.

We send you quarterly updates on CostPerform, exclusive tips & tricks and how others use CostPerform to answer their most complex costing questions.